Life behind the zion curtain, politics, music, IT, things that go fast, tasteless humor, and everything anti-bush.
Another reason to hate Texas
Published on August 16, 2005 By thatoneguyinslc In Current Events
Link

A lot of you know who Cindy Sheehan is. She's the mom leading the protest/vigil outside dubya's hideout in Crawford Texas. This article isn't about her protest. Others have covered that . This is about what happened yesterday....

Some redneck asshole took it upon themselves to drive through a few rows of the crosses erected on the side of the road. These crosses were part of her protest, and had the names of every american soldier, sailor, airman and marine killed in the Iraq war. Regardless of how you feel about her protest, i think you should be outraged. These crosses represent the sacrifices these kids made for the good old USA. It shows how some people feel about any dissent towards the war. They will go so far as to descecrate the names of those who gave all. It also shows that some will go to any length to disrespect anyone who opposes the war. Those crosses represent the losses of the families of the dead. Wether they are temporary or not is irrelevant. It is a slap in the face of every family who has lost a loved one. Regardless of how they feel about Mrs. Sheehan's protest.

But i'm not too suprised it happened. I was expecting something to happen. I never would have thought those who support the war would sink to such a level. One dumbass redneck gives the rest of you a black eye.

I guess i gave a few of them too much credit. My bad!


Thanks for reading,
thatoneguyinslc




Comments (Page 5)
8 PagesFirst 3 4 5 6 7  Last
on Aug 16, 2005
Some consider it respectful and in many ways more personal and meaningful for the families.


when did that change? i mean which former president(s) made a deliberate effort to avoid being present (or being seen) at dover when those who'd died in combat arrived back on our soil? which administration embargoed photos of the flag-draped caskets? when did it become even a little bit respectful or meaningful?

have you read 'a bright and shining lie'? if not, you've missed a fairly important work of its genre. if so, perhaps you'll recall the contrast between john paul vann's ceremony at arlington and the family meeting with nixon afterwards.
on Aug 16, 2005
Still didn't find anything even close to Cindy saying dubya was a "murderer". Miler. Swing and a miss....Strike three. You Mod and Guy all took a crack at it.
As far as why their marrige breaking up. Only they know why.

All we can do is play armchair quarterback

i saw almost nothing but pickups and large SUV's in Crawford. And the clown who mowed down the crosses was a redneck. Nuff said!
on Aug 16, 2005
Judging from your customary positions & demeanor, kb, you might praise Bush for that, but you'd be the exception to the rule.


no might about it. it wouldn't make me a fan but it would sweeten some of the bitterness.

i'm not sure i'd be the exception. i don't recall, as i noted earlier, any president in my lifetime ever being criticized for being seen with those who lost their lives under his command.
on Aug 16, 2005
Still didn't find anything even close to Cindy saying dubya was a "murderer".


gotta read between the words...

Cindy Sheehan stated, "I have lost almost every friend that I had before Casey died. My husband and I are separated, because he doesn't support my activities, although he knows the war is a lie."
on Aug 16, 2005
As far as why their marrige breaking up. Only they know why.


In an Aug. 1 interview with the Daily Kos blog, Cindy Sheehan stated, "I have lost almost every friend that I had before Casey died. My husband and I are separated, because he doesn't support my activities, although he knows the war is a lie."


What part of "because he don't support my activities" from her own mouth, don't you understand?

and that's not reading between the words.
on Aug 17, 2005
" Still didn't find anything even close to Cindy saying dubya was a "murderer". Miler."


In a letter to nightline:

" Am I emotional? Yes, my first born was murdered. Am I angry?

Yes, he was killed for lies and for a PNAC Neo-Con agenda to benefit Israel. My son joined the Army to protect America, not Israel.


She doesn't use the word 'murder' in direct relation to Bush, so one can always assume she's talking about the Iraqi who killed her son in relation to the word murder. No doubt now that she has media consultants she is only going to say the "right" things, anyway. I can't claim to know what she means, but it jives with my definition of murder. And more power to her, it's her opinion, and she has the right to express it.

It just troubles me her sincerity is lost in an ocean of political opportunism. I think she really believes all this hype is sincere, and not the usual vultures looking for a meal. Making this out to be a Zionist plot isn't helping her, either.
on Aug 17, 2005
Actually, according to the Socialist Worker, Sheehan said:

“He planned a five-week vacation while we’re in the middle of war, and I’m never going to be able to enjoy another vacation because he killed my only son. If he doesn’t come out and talk to me in Crawford, I’ll follow him to D.C. and camp out on his lawn there until he finds the integrity to talk to someone whose life he has ruined.

Casey was murdered by Bush and his insane, arrogant, callous foreign policy. What did my son die for? Last week, Bush said my son died in a noble cause. And I want to ask him what that noble cause is."


I'm not vouching for the accuracy, but that is the quote they have for her. Maybe they gave it some oomph on their own initiative.

Also, she is reported to have said:

"I want to ask the president, 'Why did you kill my son? What did my son die for?'"


I'd have to look harder to see if she really used the word murder or if people are paraphrasing her.
on Aug 17, 2005
Kingbee, your "Kerry" analogy doesn't work. Being a Naval Officer, Kerry volunteered, he also volunteered for Swiftboat duty... in fact he was all for the war in Vietnam until his own attrocities turned him against it.

But let's not go off making the example the point... The point is, he was not against the war, nor was he opposed to fighting in it. He chose to go and chose to participate beyond the requirements of his MOS. For a mechanic to have gotten permission to leave the motorpool for a day would most likely had taken a lot of pestering by him to his motor sergeant. Yes, that part is speculation on my part, but it is based on experience.

~~~~

As far as the funeral thing, you didn't answer my question. No problem, it wasn't a fair question anyway. The point was, he has met with many of the families of those killed in Iraq and that takes both guts and a concern for them that you and Mrs. Sheehan are both unwilling to accept or recognize. I understand that nothing he does will ever be good enough, that is the nature of the political beast.

~~~~

As for photos of flag draped coffins at Dover, what do we need with ghouls with press cards hanging around Dover for? If you get off on seeing pics of flag draped coffins or negative images from Iraq, surf the web for awhile, it doesn't take long to find as much as your eye wants to take in.

Prs. Bush didn't originate the moritorium, but I for one am glad he is willing to honor our fallen troops by continuing it. The only people I know who are against it are people who want nothing more than to use the image as part of an anti Bush agenda. Leave the troops who have been killed alone, they have done enough.


We obviously won't agree in this topic, but that is ok. I do wonder why the press doesn't give those who have lost loved ones and support the war even the slighest portion of the coverage Cindy Sheehan has enjoyed, but then again they aren't being bankrolled by George Soros, Michael Moore and the "hate Bush at all costs" crowd either. Sad... there are some really great stories there.
on Aug 17, 2005
Leave the troops who have been killed alone, they have done enough.


From a follow soldier, Ahman.
on Aug 17, 2005
Prs. Bush didn't originate the moritorium


who did?
on Aug 17, 2005
sorry i may have misunderstood you to be saying there was a presidential moratorium (altho in a way i guess that's true since the pentagon's moratorium on photographs at dover was started by the first president bush).

incidentally, here's barbara bush's response when asked if she hadda problem with the restriction on photos of caskets bearing the remains of those killed in action:

"Why should we hear about body bags and death and how many? ... Oh, I mean, it's not relevant. So why should I waste my beautiful mind on something like that?"
on Aug 17, 2005

Annnnnd the troll goes to Karma.

You troll me because I disagree?  I think that you have a very wrong sense of what "trolling" means.

I hope I never hear you claim "freedom of speech" on here, because you obviously only like "freedom of speech" if it agrees with you.

If you want people to have rights, then *all* people have to have them.  If you want people to display fallen soldiers names, then it needs to be in a respectful way to *them*, NOT for a hidden agenda.  She is not paying tribute to the fallen soldiers by using their names to protest the war.  Those sons and daughters died doing something they believed in.  It's not her right to use their names in that way.  How do you think the families who believed in what their children died for feel?  What about their rights?  Yes, the guy who drove through those crosses did a very sick thing, but I think that Sheehan did, too.

Hmm....so the crosses were on Dubya's property...which means that she was on his property....wouldn't that mean that she was trespassing?  The President's property is not "public" anymore than anyone else's is.  So how is it that her protest is not breaking any laws? 

I am not "pro-war".  I don't even agree with the war.  BUT, I 100% support our troops and the freedom that they uphold.  Nobody like war.  Nobody wants to see our fellow Americans die.  But, those sons and daughters died for America and freedom. To exploit those fallen soldiers in the name of "protest" is simply wrong.

on Aug 17, 2005
Actually, according to the Socialist Worker, Sheehan said:

“He planned a five-week vacation while we’re in the middle of war, and I’m never going to be able to enjoy another vacation because he killed my only son. If he doesn’t come out and talk to me in Crawford, I’ll follow him to D.C. and camp out on his lawn there until he finds the integrity to talk to someone whose life he has ruined.

“Casey was murdered by Bush and his insane, arrogant, callous foreign policy. What did my son die for? Last week, Bush said my son died in a noble cause. And I want to ask him what that noble cause is."


Thank you very much baker!

Still didn't find anything even close to Cindy saying dubya was a "murderer". Miler. Swing and a miss....Strike three. You Mod and Guy all took a crack at it.


Now who's the swing and miss? Looks like you just got shut down by baker.
on Aug 17, 2005
sorry i may have misunderstood you to be saying there was a presidential moratorium (altho in a way i guess that's true since the pentagon's moratorium on photographs at dover was started by the first president bush).

incidentally, here's barbara bush's response when asked if she hadda problem with the restriction on photos of caskets bearing the remains of those killed in action:

"Why should we hear about body bags and death and how many? ... Oh, I mean, it's not relevant. So why should I waste my beautiful mind on something like that?"


Which means exactly what? This is not the current first lady is it? Nope. What Barbara Bush says or does or does not say has absolutely no bearing on the current situation.
on Aug 17, 2005



sorry i may have misunderstood you to be saying there was a presidential moratorium (altho in a way i guess that's true since the pentagon's moratorium on photographs at dover was started by the first president bush).


Wrong again.


Since the end of the Vietnam War, presidents have worried that their military actions would lose support once the public glimpsed the remains of U.S. soldiers arriving at air bases in flag-draped caskets.

To this problem, the Bush administration has found a simple solution: It has ended the public dissemination of such images by banning news coverage and photography of dead soldiers' homecomings on all military bases.


In March, on the eve of the Iraq war, a directive arrived from the Pentagon at U.S. military bases. "There will be no arrival ceremonies for, or media coverage of, deceased military personnel returning to or departing from Ramstein [Germany] airbase or Dover [Del.] base, to include interim stops," the Defense Department said, referring to the major ports for the returning remains.


But the photos of coffins arriving at Andrews and elsewhere continued to appear through the Clinton administration. In 1996, Dover made an exception to allow filming of Clinton's visit to welcome the 33 caskets with remains from Commerce Secretary Ronald H. Brown's plane crash. In 1998, Clinton went to Andrews to see the coffins of Americans killed in the terrorist bombing in Nairobi. Dover also allowed public distribution of photos of the homecoming caskets after the terrorist attack on the USS Cole in 2000.

The photos of coffins continued for the first two years of the current Bush administration, from Ramstein and other bases. Then, on the eve of the Iraq invasion, word came from the Pentagon that other bases were to adopt Dover's policy of making the arrival ceremonies off limits.

"Whenever we go into a conflict, there's a certain amount of guidance that comes down the pike," said Lt. Olivia Nelson, a spokeswoman for Dover. "It's a consistent policy across the board. Where it used to apply only to Dover, they've now made it very clear it applies to everyone."
8 PagesFirst 3 4 5 6 7  Last